• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Jobs
  • Pressroom
  • MyTTI
  • Contact Us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • SlideShare
  • RSS

Texas A&M Transportation Institute

Saving Lives, Time and Resources.

  • About TTI
    • Overview
    • Academic Partners
    • Advisory Council
    • Hall of Honor
    • History
    • Sponsors
    • Participate in Research
  • Focus Areas
    • Connected Transportation
    • Economics
    • Environment
    • Freight
    • Human Interaction
    • Infrastructure
    • Mobility
    • Planning and Operations
    • Policy
    • Safety
    • Security
    • Workforce Development
  • Facilities
    • Connected Transportation
    • Infrastructure
    • Safety
    • Environment
    • Traffic Operations
    • Maps
  • Home
  • Centers
    • National
    • State
    • Research Internships
  • People
    • People Search
    • Directory
    • Featured Researchers
    • TTI Staff External Awards and Committees
  • Publications
    • Catalog Search
    • Texas Transportation Researcher
Home » Projects » Featured Projects » Performance Comparison of Various Seal Coat Grades Used in Texas

Performance Comparison of Various Seal Coat Grades Used in Texas

Distributor applying aggregate on a roadway.

A distributor applies aggregate to a roadway during a seal coat application.

Other road preservation methods can cost seven to ten times more than a seal coat.

What’s the Problem?

To extend the life of a road, water penetration must be controlled. Seal coats excel in keeping water from reaching the roadway base and have been a cost-effective method of roadway rehabilitation for the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) for many years. Some motorists and homeowners have questioned the effectiveness of the procedure due to the perceived loudness of the finished surface. They believe it is a cheap, ineffective maintenance technique instead of a proper surface repair. Bicyclists complain about the difficulty of riding on shoulders with seal coat applications.

What’s the Solution?

Texas A&M Transportation Institute (TTI) pavement researchers measured seal coat noise levels from multiple locations in Texas. Additional noise level testing was conducted on specially constructed test sections. Researchers also looked at the longevity of different seal coat applications.

Although researchers determined that seal coats tend to be noisier than other types of pavement, in many cases the difference in noise level is so small that the human ear can’t tell the difference. Some concrete pavements, for example, measured just as loud as a seal coat. In most cases, smaller aggregate makes for a quieter seal coat surface. Smaller aggregate also makes bike riding on shoulders easier. Many TxDOT districts are now placing smaller aggregate on shoulders while larger, more durable aggregate is being placed in main travel lanes.

Seal coat longevity depends on many factors. The condition of the road prior to seal coating has a great deal to do with durability. Higher traffic counts shorten the life of seal coats. Climate plays a role, too, with cooler temperatures extending seal coat life. Researchers developed a set of guidelines to assist TxDOT districts with best practices in seal coating.

Benefits

Texas has more miles of non-city roadways than any other state. Given limited resources and personnel at TxDOT, these roads must be maintained in the most cost-effective manner possible. John Bohuslav, director of maintenance for TxDOT’s San Antonio District, notes that 10,000 miles of roads cross the San Antonio District alone. Other road preservation methods can cost seven to ten times more than a seal coat.

“A road that needs a seal coat may look fine to the average driver, because they don’t get out and look at the surface. Because of the number of miles of road TxDOT must maintain, the agency can’t afford to use costlier methods. When dealing with low-traffic roads, a seal coat is the best choice,” Bohuslav says.

The results of this project validate TxDOT’s use of seal coats and provide guidelines regarding aggregate choice. Using these guidelines can help TxDOT maintain roads effectively while, at the same time, using resources and personnel most efficiently for the state as a whole.

Project Title

Quantifying the Effects in Order to Optimize the Use of Grade 3 and Grade 4 Seal Coats

Project Number

0-6496

Project Sponsor(s)

Texas Department of Transportation

Project Category

Infrastructure

Project Termination Date

August 2012

Project Publications

  • Performance Comparison of Various Seal Coat Grades Used in Texas--Technical Report (PDF)

For More Information

Cindy K. Estakhri, P.E.

Research Engineer
Recyclable Materials
Texas A&M Transportation Institute
The Texas A&M University System
3135 TAMU
College Station, TX 77843-3135
Ph. (979) 317-2308
c-estakhri@tamu.edu

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • The State of Texas
  • Texas Homeland Security
  • Texas Veterans Portal
  • State Expenditure Database
  • Statewide Search
  • State Auditor’s Office Hotline
  • TAMUS Risk, Fraud & Misconduct Hotline
  • Site Policies
  • Open Records Policy
  • Statutorily Required Reports
  • TTI Rules
  • Veterans
  • Equal Opportunity
  • COVID-19 Info
  • Jobs
Member of the Texas A&M University System

© 2023 Copyright Statement / Legal Notices and Policies

Comments, suggestions, or queries? Contact us!

Texas A&M Transportation Institute · 3135 TAMU · College Station, Texas 77843-3135

(979) 317-2000