• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Jobs
  • Pressroom
  • MyTTI
  • Contact Us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • SlideShare
  • RSS

Texas A&M Transportation Institute

Saving Lives, Time and Resources.

  • About TTI
    • Overview
    • Academic Partners
    • Advisory Council
    • Hall of Honor
    • History
    • Sponsors
    • Participate in Research
  • Focus Areas
    • Connected Transportation
    • Economics
    • Environment
    • Freight
    • Human Interaction
    • Infrastructure
    • Mobility
    • Planning and Operations
    • Policy
    • Safety
    • Security
    • Workforce Development
  • Facilities
    • Connected Transportation
    • Infrastructure
    • Safety
    • Environment
    • Traffic Operations
    • Maps
  • Home
  • Centers
    • National
    • State
    • Research Internships
  • People
    • People Search
    • Directory
    • Featured Researchers
    • TTI Staff External Awards and Committees
  • Publications
    • Catalog Search
    • Texas Transportation Researcher
You are here: Home / News / TTI Researchers Identify Elusive Relationship Between Safety and Pavement Marking Brightness

TTI Researchers Identify Elusive Relationship Between Safety and Pavement Marking Brightness

April 30, 2014

Roadway at night with bright reflective pavement markingsIn what is described as a key breakthrough regarding safer nighttime driving, Texas A&M Transportation Institute (TTI) researchers have identified a technique for developing safety-based retroreflectivity criteria for pavement markings.

The technique, described in a Transportation Research Board paper submitted by TTI Senior Research Engineer Paul Carlson and TTI Associate Research Scientist Raul Avelar, quantifies the link between pavement marking retroreflectivity and nighttime safety.

“The FHWA (Federal Highway Administration) is developing minimum pavement marking retroreflectivity levels for the MUTCD, which are based on the visibility needs of the driver — can you see the pavement marking far enough to react in time?” said Carlson. “That’s different from what we’re doing here. We are trying to develop safety-derived retroreflectivity criteria. The visibility-derived minimums are thought to be related to safety but our research is based on nighttime crashes and measured retroreflectivity levels.”

According to Carlson, the relationship between safety and pavement marking retroreflectivity has been studied with mixed results. For this study, TTI probably had the richest combination of retroreflectivity data and crashes available for research.  Avelar used advanced mathematical analyses to mine and study the data, which were made available from the Michigan Department of Transportation (DOT).

“We accounted for other important factors explicitly, such as traffic volume and roadway length, we then calibrated a function describing how retroreflectivity contributes to explaining the number of crashes,” said Avelar. “We expressed it in a way that makes mathematical sense. We could then quantify the expected significance of that effect in statistical terms.”

The results were the creation of a crash modification function for pavement marking retroreflectivity. With that, DOTs may define a point at which retroreflectivity of the centerline is most effective, from the safety standpoint. Carlson’s research team is currently in the process of acquiring additional data sets from North Carolina DOT for further testing and validation.

“Our results indicate that retroreflectivity of pavement markings does relate to safety,” said Carlson. “It’s been an elusive relationship. We’re not saying that we’re there, but we have a very promising technique that raises the bar.”

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: News Tagged With: Paul Carlson, retroreflectivity, Transportation Research Board

  • The State of Texas
  • Texas Homeland Security
  • Texas Veterans Portal
  • State Expenditure Database
  • Statewide Search
  • State Auditor’s Office Hotline
  • TAMUS Risk, Fraud & Misconduct Hotline
  • Site Policies
  • Open Records Policy
  • Statutorily Required Reports
  • TTI Rules
  • Veterans
  • Equal Opportunity
  • COVID-19 Info
  • Jobs
Member of the Texas A&M University System

© 2023 Copyright Statement / Legal Notices and Policies

Comments, suggestions, or queries? Contact us!

Texas A&M Transportation Institute · 3135 TAMU · College Station, Texas 77843-3135

(979) 317-2000

 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.