• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Jobs
  • Pressroom
  • MyTTI
  • Contact Us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • SlideShare
  • RSS

Texas A&M Transportation Institute

Saving Lives, Time and Resources.

  • About TTI
    • Overview
    • Academic Partners
    • Advisory Council
    • Hall of Honor
    • History
    • Sponsors
    • Participate in Research
  • Focus Areas
    • Connected Transportation
    • Economics
    • Environment
    • Freight
    • Human Interaction
    • Infrastructure
    • Mobility
    • Planning and Operations
    • Policy
    • Safety
    • Security
    • Workforce Development
  • Facilities
    • Connected Transportation
    • Infrastructure
    • Safety
    • Environment
    • Traffic Operations
    • Maps
  • Home
  • Centers
    • National
    • State
    • Research Internships
  • People
    • People Search
    • Directory
  • Publications
    • Catalog Search
    • Texas Transportation Researcher
Home / Publications / Catalog Search / Guidelines for Evaluation of Existing Pavements for HMA Overlay

Guidelines for Evaluation of Existing Pavements for HMA Overlay

Full-Text PDF

Author(s):

F. Zhou, T. Scullion

Publication Date

May 2007

Abstract

This report discusses the application of nondestructive test (NDT) tools for evaluating existing pavements for hot-mix asphalt (HMA) overlays.The NDT tools covered in this report include ground penetrating radar (GPR), falling weight deflectometer (F WD), and rolling dynamic deflectometer (R DD). The GPR is used to estimate the thickness of existing pavement layers, and identify section breaks and potential trapped moisture problems. The FWD is used to evaluate the structural capacity of the existing pavement, and the in-situ layer modulus can be backcalculated from FWD data. In addition, for existing concrete pavements, the FWD can be used to determine load transfer efficiency (LTE) at joints and/or cracks. The application of the RDD to evaluate existing concrete pavements is also discussed. The major advantage the RDD has over other discrete NDT devices (e.g.,F WD) is that it provides continuous deflection profiles of the pavement, which can be used to identify joints with poor LTE. However, no software is available to automatically interpret the RDD data. After reviewing RDD data collected on several different concrete pavements, the researchers developed some basic interpretation criteria for the RDD data. Based on the measured RDD deflection data and the monitored field reflective cracking performance on IH20, threshold values for RDD Sensor 1 deflection and the differential deflection between Sensors 1 and 3 are recornmended. If either the Sensor I deflection or the differential deflection between Sensors I and 3 is larger than the proposed thresholds, the corresponding joint and/or cracks is recommended for pretreatment before placing a new HMA overlay. Finally, general guidelines for evaluating existing pavements for HMA overlays are proposed in this report.

Report Number:

0-5123-2

Keywords:

Asphalt Overlay Thickness Design, F WD, GPR, NondestructiveT esting, R DD, Reflective Cracking

Link(s):

Document/Product

http://tti.tamu.edu/documents/0-5123-2.pdf

Publication/Product Request

TTI reports and products are available for download at no charge. If an electronic version is not available and no instructions on how to obtain it are given, contact the TTI Library.

  • The State of Texas
  • Texas Homeland Security
  • Texas Veterans Portal
  • State Expenditure Database
  • Statewide Search
  • State Auditor’s Office Hotline
  • TAMUS Risk, Fraud & Misconduct Hotline
  • Site Policies
  • Open Records Policy
  • Statutorily Required Reports
  • TTI Rules
  • Veterans
  • Equal Opportunity
  • COVID-19 Info
  • Jobs
Member of the Texas A&M University System

© 2025 Copyright Statement / Legal Notices and Policies

Comments, suggestions, or queries? Contact us!

Texas A&M Transportation Institute · 3135 TAMU · College Station, Texas 77843-3135

(979) 317-2000