• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Jobs
  • Pressroom
  • MyTTI
  • Contact Us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • SlideShare
  • RSS

Texas A&M Transportation Institute

Saving Lives, Time and Resources.

  • About TTI
    • Overview
    • Academic Partners
    • Advisory Council
    • Hall of Honor
    • History
    • Sponsors
    • Participate in Research
  • Focus Areas
    • Connected Transportation
    • Economics
    • Environment
    • Freight
    • Human Interaction
    • Infrastructure
    • Mobility
    • Planning and Operations
    • Policy
    • Safety
    • Security
    • Workforce Development
  • Facilities
    • Connected Transportation
    • Infrastructure
    • Safety
    • Environment
    • Traffic Operations
    • Maps
  • Home
  • Centers
    • National
    • State
    • Research Internships
  • People
    • People Search
    • Directory
  • Publications
    • Catalog Search
    • Texas Transportation Researcher
Home / Publications / Catalog Search / In-Place Engineering Properties of Recycled and Stabilized Pavement Layers

In-Place Engineering Properties of Recycled and Stabilized Pavement Layers

Full-Text PDF

Author(s):

I.M. Syed, T. Scullion

Publication Date

December 1998

Abstract

A structural evaluation was performed on 25 base recycling projects in the Bryan District. The recycled layers were stabilized with cement or lime, and each was 250 mm thick. On the higher volume roadways, an unstabilized flexible base was placed over the stabilized layer, followed by a two course surface treatment (2 CST). On the other pavements the 2 CST was placed directly on the stabilized layer. Testing involved the use of the Dynaflect, falling weight deflectometer, dynamic cone penetrometer, and ground penetrating radar. A correlation was generated between the backcalculated layer moduli and the percentage of stabilizer used.|Two visual surveys were completed. In 1997, of the 25 sections evaluated, 23 were judged to be performing well, with little or no surface distress. However, after the severe Texas summer of 1998, only 17 were judged to be performing well. The major distress found was severe localized longitudinal cracking, which originated in the subgrade. The shrink/swell potential of the subgrade soil appears to be the major factor controlling pavement performance. Sections constructed on soils with a plasticity index (PI) of more than 35 did not perform well. The severity of the surface cracking was also related to the following secondary factors: a) the summer droughts of 1996 and 1998, b) the presence of trees near the edge of the pavement, c) the side slope conditions, and d) the strength of the stabilized layer.|In conclusion, the base recycling technique applied by the Bryan District appears to be working if the subgrade soils have low to moderate PIs. This technique is not recommended for sections constructed on high PI subgrades. Recommendations to modify the existing design approach are proposed for these problem areas.

Report Number:

7-3903-S

Keywords:

Base Recycling, Cement, DCP, Dynaflect, FWD, Lime, pavement rehabilitation, Reclamation

Link(s):

Document/Product

http://tti.tamu.edu/documents/3903-S.pdf

Publication/Product Request

TTI reports and products are available for download at no charge. If an electronic version is not available and no instructions on how to obtain it are given, contact the TTI Library.

  • The State of Texas
  • Texas Homeland Security
  • Texas Veterans Portal
  • State Expenditure Database
  • Statewide Search
  • State Auditor’s Office Hotline
  • TAMUS Risk, Fraud & Misconduct Hotline
  • Site Policies
  • Open Records Policy
  • Statutorily Required Reports
  • TTI Rules
  • Veterans
  • Equal Opportunity
  • COVID-19 Info
  • Jobs
Member of the Texas A&M University System

© 2025 Copyright Statement / Legal Notices and Policies

Comments, suggestions, or queries? Contact us!

Texas A&M Transportation Institute · 3135 TAMU · College Station, Texas 77843-3135

(979) 317-2000